Актуальні питання вибору способу розродження жінок з кесаревим розтином в анамнезі

Автор(и)

  • Л.Г. Назаренко Харківська медична академія післядипломної освіти, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2018.133.10

Ключові слова:

розродження шляхом кесарева розтину, частота, причини, повторний кесарів розтин, вагінальні пологи

Анотація

Медико-соціальне значення проблеми абдомінального розродження визначається його поширеністю, впливом на найважливіші показники здоров’я, параметри материнської і перинатальної летальності. Частота кесарева розтину (КР) неконтрольовано і невпинно зростає, що породжує нові проблеми розродження раніше прооперованих жінок, які в українських реаліях вирішуються здебільшого однобічно, на користь елективного повторного КР. У статті наведені актуальні дані переважно закордонних авторів щодо найбільш дискусійних аспектів проблеми: ризику первинного КР, шляхів керування загальною частотою КР, частоти і можливостей прогнозу успіху вагінальних пологів.

Посилання

Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M et al. (2014). Processo de decisão pelo tipo de parto no Brasil: da preferência inicial das mulheres à via de Parto Final. Cad Saude Publica. 30: S101–S116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00105113

Gibbons L, Belizán J, Lauer J et al. (2010). The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report: 30.

Orlova VS, Kalashnikova IV, Bulgakova EV, Voronova YuV. (2013). Abdominalnoe rodorazreshenie kak mediko-sotsialnaya problema sovremennogo akusherstva. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskih bolezney LXII; 4: 6–14.

Radzinskiy VE. (2011). Akusherskaya agressiya. M, Izd-vo zhurnala Status Praesens: 688.

Radzinskiy VE, Knyazev SA, Kostin IN. (2009). Akusherskiy risk. Maksimum informatsii – minimum opasnosti dlya materi i mladentsa. M, Eksmo: 288.

Bailit JL. (2010). Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data. Am J Obstet. Gynecol. 203: 269–e1-3.

Little SE, Orav EJ, Robinson JN et al. (2016). The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 214: 735.e1.– 8.

Budhwa T et al. (2010). Application of the Robson classification of cesarean section in focus: Robson group. A report by the child health network for the greater Toronto area. Toronto: 60.

Armstrong JC, Kozhimannil KB, McDermott P et al. (2016). Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures. FEBRUARY 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 214; 2: 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.935; PMid:26593970

Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. (2014). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean deliver 210: 179–93.

Shields L, Klein C, Pelletreau B, Wiesner S. (2018). The SMFM cesarean birth rate can safely be reduced without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology: 541-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.500

Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ et al. (2009). Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 151:252–63. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007; PMid:19687492

Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F et al. (2016). Effect of induction of labor on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous patients: results from the prospective multi-center Genesis Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology: 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.691

Nicholson MJ, Stenson MH, Kellar L et al. (2009). Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200: 254.e1.– 254.

Melman S, Schoorel E, Vrouenraets F et al. (2013). Analysis of current Dutch practice on cesarean deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology: 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.118

Rossi A Cristina, Vincenzo D’Addario. (2008). Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 199; 3: 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.025; PMid:18511018

Tucker S, Kanaan C, Plevyak M et al. (2003). Are we trending back to “once a cesarean birth, always a cesarean birth”? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 189; 6: 139.

Polenov NI. (2008). Funktsionalnoe sostoyanie nizhnego segmenta matki u beremennyih zhenschin posle kesareva secheniya. Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk: 14.01.01. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 14.00.16. Patologicheskaya fiziologiya. SPb:28.

Khatib N, Emad M, Beloosesky R et al. (2015). New model, based on cervical length, predicts successful VBAC. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 212;1, Supplement: 195–S196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.418

Ruhstaller K, Hoffman MK, Sciscione A. (2012). Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the impact of BMI. Am. J. Obste. Gynecol.: 295–296.

Tilden EL, Cheyney M, Guise J-M et al. (2017). Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 216: 403.e1.:1–8.

Perminova EI. (2010). Patomorfologicheskiy analiz rubtsov miometriya posle kesareva secheniya i konservativnoy miomektomii. Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk: 14.03.02. Patologicheskaya anatomiya; 14.01.01. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. Nauchno-issledovatelskiy institut regionalnoy patologii i patomorfologii SO RAMN. Novosibirsk:25.

Worstell T, Kaimal A, Cahill A et al. (2015, Jan). Inducing a TOLAC: worth the risk? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Sup: 205–206.

Nazarenko LH, Nedorezova KM. (2016). Kryterii obiektyvizatsii prohnozu uspikhu vahinalnykh polohiv u zhinok z kesarevym roztynom v anamnezi. Akusherstvo. Hinekolohiia. Henetyka 3:5–10.

Schoorel E, Scheepers H, Hunen D et al. 2014. Probability of vaginal birth after caesarean: don’t ask the obstetrician. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology: 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.608

Vdovychenko YuP, Hurzhenko OIu. (2015). Alhorytm diahnostyky, profilaktyky ta likuvannia seksualnykh dysfunktsii u zhinok pislia kesareva roztynu. Zdorove zhenshchynу 10:70–72.

Horbunova OV. (2007). Patolohiia reproduktyvnoi systemy u zhinok z operovanoiu matkoiu. Avtoref. dys. d-ra med. nauk: 14.01.01. Akusherstvo ta ginekolohiia. K:31.

Poluianova OM. (2015). Optymizatsiia predhravidarnoi pidhotovky u zhinok z rubtsem na mattsi pislia kesareva roztynu. Dys. kand. med. nauk: 14.01.01. Akusherstvo ta hinekolohiia. NMAPO. K:135.

Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. (2005). Abnormal placentation: Twenty-year analysis. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 192;5:1458–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074; PMid:15902137

Kaelin AA, Cali G, Monteagudo A et al. (2017). The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 216:510.e.1-6.

Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V et al. (2014). Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 211; 5: 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014; PMid:24912096

Macones GA. (2008). Clinical outcomes in VBAC attempts: what to say to patients? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.040.

Arikan I, Barut A, Harma M et al. (2012). Cesarean section with relative indications versus spontaneous vaginal delivery: short-term outcomes of maternofetal health. Clinical And Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 39;3:288–292. PMid:23157026

Metz T, Allshouse A, Grobman W. (2015). Validation of vaginal birth after cesarean prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 212;1:74.

Bujold E, Gauthier R. (2003). An innovative scoring system to counsel patients with a prior cesarean delivery: a step towards a safer and more successful trial of labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189;6, Supplement:S139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.284

Krasnopolskiy VI, Logutova LS, Buyanova SN. (2015). Reproduktivnyie problemyi operirovannoy matki. M:160.

Honcharuk NP, Kovyda NR. (2016). Diahnostyka nespromozhnosti rubtsia na mattsi pislia kesareva roztynu (Ohliad literatury). Zdorove zhenshchynы 7:171-173.

Mardy AH, Ananth CV, Grobman WA, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. (2016). Prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 214; 1:198–S199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.393

Miller E, Sakowicz A, Donelan E, Grobman W. (2015). Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 212;1:75–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.162

Khatib N, Emad M, Beloosesky R et al. (2015). New model, based on cervical length, predicts successful VBAC. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 212;1: Supplement: S195–196.

Elkousyi M, Marchiano D, Parry S et al. (2001). Mothers with macrosomic fetuses should not be discouraged from vaginal dirth after cesarean section. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 185;6. SMFM Abstracts: 209.

Erfani H, Davidson C, Gandhi M et al. (2018). TOLAC success in twin pregnancies in the United States (2013-2015). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 218; 1; Suppl: S148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.154

Silver RK, Gibbs RS. (1987). Predictors of vaginal delivery in patients with a previous cesarean section, who require oxytocin. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 156; 1: 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(87)90202-X

Son M, Roy A, Grobman WA. (2017). Attempted operative vaginal delivery versus repeat cesarean in the second stage in women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 216;1:68–S69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.984

Maggio L, Forbes J, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Davidson C. (2012, Jan). Association of Montevideo units with uterine rupture in women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. suppl: 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.680

Gabidullina RI, Fatkullin IF, Kiyasov AP i dr. (2002). Kliniko-morfologicheskie paralleli v otsenke sostoyaniya rubtsa na matke posle kesareva secheniya. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal 83;6:424–429.

Nezhdanov IG, Pavlov RV, Aksenenko VA, Telegina IV. (2012). Nekotoryie aspektyi razryiva matki po rubtsu posle operatsii kesareva secheniya. Meditsinskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza 2:82–83.

Harper LM, Cahill AG, Boslaugh S et al. (2012). Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206;1:51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.022; PMid:22000899 PMCid:PMC3246100

Kurtser MA, Breslav IYu, Evteev VB i dr. (2017). Sravnitelnaya harakteristika endovaskulyarnyih metodov ostanovki krovotecheniya pri placenta accreta. Voprosyi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii 5:17–24.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2018-09-30

Номер

Розділ

Дистанційне навчання